PHILLIPS

v.

TEXAS

Citator

Cited By

• Burton N. Pugach v. Honorable Isidore Dollinger, 277 F.2d 739 (2d Cir. 1960)
  …If the offered evidence is admitted, despite Benanti, supra, and if Pugach is convicted and his conviction is affirmed by the New York Court of Appeals — see People v. Dinan, 1959, 6 N.Y.2d 715, 185 N.Y.S.2d 806, 158 N.E. 2d 501, certiorari denied, 361 U.S. 839, 80 S.Ct. 71, 4 L.Ed.2d 78; People v. Variano, 1959, 5 N.Y.2d 391, 185 N.Y.S.2d 1, 157 N.E. 2d 857 — even then that conviction is subject to review by the Supreme Court. This possibility of a final federal review of a federal question is perhaps eno…
• United States ex rel. Dominick Graziano v. McMANN, 275 F.2d 284 (2d Cir. 1960)
  …N.E. 2d 857; People v. Saperstein, 1957, 2 N.Y.2d 210, 159 N.Y.S.2d 160, 140 N.E. 2d 252. Cf. People v. Dinan, 2nd Dept., 1958, 7 A.D.2d 119, 181 N.Y.S.2d 122, affirmed 1959, 6 N.Y. 2d 715, 185 N.Y.S.2d 806, 158 N.E. 2d 501, certiorari denied 1959, 361 U.S. 839, 80 S.Ct. 71, 4 L.Ed.2d 78. Even though, unless authorized by the sender, evidence obtained by intercepted wiretap would be clearly inadmissible in a federal court, Nardone v. United States, 1937, 302 U.S. 379, 58 S.Ct. 275, 82 L.Ed. 314; Weiss v. U…