RODRIGUEZ

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Bruce v. United States, 379 F.2d 113 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
  …review or reassess by hindsight the judgment of defense counsel on questions of strategy, trial tactics or trial decisions. See, e.g., Edwards v. United States, supra, note 3; Smith v. United States, 105 U.S.App.D.C. 115, 265 F. 2d 99, cert. denied, 361 U.S. 843, 80 S.Ct. 95, 4 L.Ed.2d 81 (1959); Willis v. United States, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 211, 271 F. 2d 477 (1959), cert. denied, 362 U.S. 964, 80 S.Ct. 881, 4 L.Ed.2d 879 (1960); Alexander v. United States, 290 F. 2d 252 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 891,…
• Gandy v. State OF Ala., 569 F.2d 1318 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …te Hancock’s performance, given the result we reach. . Compare Williams v. United States, 332 F. 2d 36 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 976, 85 S.Ct. 672, 13 L.Ed.2d 566 (1964) and Majeske v. United States, 266 F. 2d 947 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 843, 80 S.Ct. 95, 4 L.Ed.2d 81 (1959) with United States v. Tramunti, 513 F. 2d 1087 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832, 96 S.Ct. 54, 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975) and United States v. Inman, supra. . Compare Releford v. United States, 288 F. 2d 298 (9th Cir…
• Royal Indem. Co. v. The United States & Jersey State Bank, 371 F.2d 462 (Ct. Cl. 1967)
  …and with precision are insufficient to prevent the award of summary judgment.” [Emphasis added.] Engl v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 139 F. 2d 469 (2d Cir. 1943); accord, e. g., Curtis v. United States, 168 F.Supp. 213, 144 Ct.Cl. 194 (1958), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 843, 80 S.Ct. 94, 4 L.Ed.2d 81 (1959); Garcia v. United States, 108 F.Supp. 608, 123 Ct.Cl. 722 (1952); Bruce Constr. Corp. v. United States, 242 F. 2d 873 (5th Cir. 1957). Bank’s averment is at best based on hearsay and is merely a belief held by Bank’…