MACNEIL

v.

JULIAN

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• United States v. American-Foreign S.S. Corp., 363 U.S. 685 (U.S. 1960)
  …n in the en banc determination was precluded by the plain language of the controlling statute. 265 F. 2d 136, 155. Certiorari was granted to consider a question of importance to the Courts of Appeals in the administration of their judicial business. 361 U. S. 861. As a preliminary to decision of the precise question before us it is important to make clear that this case in no way involves the eligibility of a retired judge to participate [*688] in the hearing, rehearing or determination of a case as a membe…
• Ward v. Atl. Coast Line R.R. Co., 362 U.S. 396 (U.S. 1960)
  …51-60, the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, by a divided court, affirmed a judgment in favor of the respondent railroad entered on a jury verdict in the District Court for the Northern District of Florida. 265 F. 2d 75. We granted certiorari, 361 U. S. 861, to consider the issues presented in the light of our decisions in Sinkler v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 356 U. S. 326, and Baker v. Texas & Pacific R. Co., 359 U. S. 227. The latter is an intervening decision. The railroad employed the petitioner as…
• Smith v. Yeager, 393 U.S. 122 (U.S. 1968)
  …with this opinion. /£ {s so ordered. Mb. Justice White dissents and would grant certiorari and set the case for oral argument. Petitioner has sought, and was denied, certiorari in this Court on three previous occasions — twice to the state courts, 361 U. S. 861; 379 U. S. 1005, once to the United States Court of Appeals in the [*124] prior habeas corpus proceeding, 376 U. S. 928. It is worth noting that the present pleadings below substantially expand and clarify the claims heretofore presented by petition…