PUCO

v.

UNITED STATES; LESSA ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; STROMBERG ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; TEITELBAUM V. UNITED STATES; BEHRMAN V. UNITED STATES; MAIMONE V. UNITED STATES; AND MIRRA ET AL. V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (81 total)

• United States v. Borelli, 336 F.2d 376 (2d Cir. 1964)
  …racy as in United States v. Bruno, 105 F. 2d 921 (2 Cir.), rev’d on other grounds, 308 U.S. 287, 60 S.Ct. 198, 84 L.Ed. 257 (1939); United States v. Rich, 262 F. 2d 415 (2 Cir. 1959); United States v. Stromberg, 268 F. 2d 256 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 863, 80 S.Ct. 119, 4 L.Ed.2d 102 (1959); United States v. Agueci, supra; and United States v. Bentvena, 319 F. 2d 916 (2 Cir.), cert. denied [Ormento v. United States, Di Pietro v. United States, Fernandez v. United States, Panico v. United States, Gala…
• United States v. Vito Agueci, 310 F.2d 817 (2d Cir. 1962)
  …. United States, 332 U.S. 539, 68 S.Ct. 248, 92 L. Ed. 154 (1947); United States v. Aviles, 274 F. 2d 179 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 362 U.S. 974, 80 S.Ct. 1057, 4 L.Ed.2d 1009 (1960); United States v. Stromberg, 268 F. 2d 256 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 863, 80 S.Ct. 119, 4 L.Ed.2d 102 (1959); United States v. Rich, 262 F. 2d 415 (2d Cir., 1959). The “chain” conspiracy has as its ultimate purpose the placing of the forbidden commodity into the hands of the ultimate purchaser. See Note, “Federal Treatme…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• United States v. Bentvena, 319 F.2d 916 (2d Cir. 1963)
  …formation of a new conspiracy and not a new participation' in the old is not well founded. A conspiracy, once established, is presumed to continue until the contrary is demonstrated, United States v. Stromberg, 268 F. 2d 256 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 863, 80 S.Ct. 119, 4 L.Ed.2d 102, (1955), and cases cited therein. Further, a conspiracy of this kind is, by its very nature, constantly expanding. The outlet contemplated at this meeting would have become just one more “drop” in the scheme of distribut…

  ← 1 / 2 →