BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE FIREMEN AND ENGINEMEN ET AL.

v.

ANACONDA COMPANY ET AL.; AND BUTTE, ANACONDA & PACIFIC RAILWAY CO. V. BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE FIREMEN AND ENGINEMEN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Pecnik v. Blackburn, 132 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961)
  …proving that he was not in the demanding state at the time the crime was committed is upon the defendant. State v. Phillips, 1960, 62 N.J.Super. 70, 162 A. 2d 113. People ex rel. James v. Lynch, 1959, 16 Ill.2d 380, 158 N.E. 2d 60; certiorari denied 361 U.S. 864, 80 S.Ct. 123, 4 L.Ed.2d 104; People ex rel. Borelli v. Lohman, 1958, 13 Ill.2d 506, 150 N.E. 2d 116. It, therefore, plainly appears from the demand that the accused was charged and convicted of a crime, the nature of which required his presence at…
• Rutland Ry. Corp. v. Bhd. OF Locomotive Eng'rs, 307 F.2d 21 (2d Cir. 1962)
  …his case but how to distinguish it from all the cases finding minor disputes. Viewed from that perspective, the “uncertainty” vanishes. In any case, Butte, A. & Pac. Ry. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen, 268 F. 2d 54 (9 Cir. 1959), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 864, 80 S.Ct. 122, 4 L.Ed.2d 104 (1959) is precisely on point and explicitly supports my view of the statute. I do not grasp how it may be disposed of simply by asserting the facts are different.18 As for Hilbert v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 290 F. 2d 881 (7…

  ← 1 / 5 →
• PAN Am. World Airways, Inc. v. Flight Eng'rs' Int'l Ass'n, PAA Chapter, AFL-CIO, 306 F.2d 840 (2d Cir. 1962)
  …ut-off date for the termination of such assistance, and the relegation thereafter of the parties to the use of their economic weapons. See Butte, Anaconda & Pac. Ry. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen, 268 F. 2d 54, 58-59 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 864, 80 S.Ct. 122, 4 L.Ed. 2d 104 (1959). It follows that no injunction can issue under the Act against a strike which is undertaken after the mediation processes of the Act have been completed and the time limit which is provided has elapsed. See Brot…

  ← 1 / 2 →