ALEXANDER

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Berger v. Iron Workers Reinforced Rodmen Local 201, 843 F.2d 1395 (D.C. Cir. 1988)
  …may remain autonomous and independent notwithstanding the fact that the International retains a degree of supervisory authority.” Boss, 567 F.Supp. at 847 (citing Baldwin v. Poughkeepsie Newspapers, Inc., 268 F. 2d 871 (7th Cir.1958), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 869 (1959)). For this reason, an agency relationship cannot simply be presumed rather than proved; “the diverse situations possible in the varied relationship between parent and local unions make individual examination of the facts, rather than a mecha…
• MacOmber v. Gladden, 304 F.2d 487 (9th Cir. 1962)
  …r.General Laws ch. 334 § 4 (1927). See Or.Rev.Stats. ch. 168. . See Macomber v. State, 181 Or. 208, 180 P. 2d 793 (1947); Macomber v. Alexander, 197 Or. 685, 255 P. 2d 164 (1953); Macomber v. Gladden, 216 Or. 579, 337 P. 2d 971 (1959), cert. denied 361 U.S. 869, 80 S.Ct. 131, 4 L.Ed.2d 109 (1959). . Under Oregon law denial of appellant’s first motion in eoram nobis was not appealable. State v. Endsley, 214 Or. 537, 542, 331 P. 2d 338, 340 (1958). Appellant sought to obtain review by writ of mandamus. The…

  ← 1 / 2 →