STEPHENSON

v.

BARBER

Citator

Cited By

• del Castillo v. Ralor Pharmacy, Inc., 512 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
  …elf constitutes a final judgment. . Even when execution does not issue, a pre-fi-nal-disposition money "judgment” is improper. Wabash Life Ins. Co. v. Rosenberg, 177 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965) (Carroll, J., specially concurring), prohib. denied, 184 So. 2d 889 (Fla.1966). . The correct form of such a ruling was set out in Pointer Oil, 293 So. 2d at 390: When, on motion of a plaintiff for summary judgment, the court determines that some but not all of the issues may be determined summarily, that is, that…
• R. R. (Bob) Walden v. The Borden Co., 235 So. 2d 300 (Fla. 1970)
  …District Court of Appeal, Second District, in Walden v. Borden Company, Fla.App.1969, 221 So. 2d 771, affirming without opinion the trial court’s summary judgment under the authority of Matheson v. Elcock, Fla.App.1965, 173 So. 2d 164, cert. disch., 184 So. 2d 889. We have examined the record proper, see Foley v. Weaver Drugs, Inc., Fla.1965, 177 So. 2d 221, and have concluded that the trial court’s judgment was improper under the well settled rule respecting the propriety of a summary judgment where there is…
• Prudential-Bache Sec., Inc. v. Jed Bandes, 510 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)
  …Ltd., 460 So. 2d 940 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). Similarly, the unresolved element of prejudgment interested not disparage the June 9 order’s conclusiveness. See Wabash Life Insurance Co. v. Rosenberg, 177 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965), prohibition denied, 184 So. 2d 889 (Fla.1966). Thus, Prudential-Bache was required by Rule 1.530(b) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure to serve an appropriate motion within 10 days, or by June 19, to achieve a rehearing of the June 9 order. A motion for rehearing was not served…