PHILLIPS

v.

NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By

• Clay v. Sun Ins. Off. Ltd., 363 U.S. 207 (U.S. 1960)
  …ot decide this threshold question because it apparently found it easier to decide the constitutional question that would be presented only if the statute did apply. Such disposition of a serious constitutional issue justified bringing the case here. 361 U. S. 874. By the settled canons of constitutional adjudication the constitutional issue should have been reached only if, after decision of two non-constitutional questions, decision was compelled. The lower court should have [*210] first considered: (1) wh…
• Schilling v. Rogers, 363 U.S. 666 (U.S. 1960)
  …ative disposition was precluded by § 7 (c) of the Trading with the Enemy Act. 106 U. S. App. D. C. 8, 268 F. 2d 584. Because of the importance of the question in the proper administration of the Trading with the Enemy Act we brought the case here. 361 U. S. 874. For reasons given hereafter we affirm the judgment below. Petitioner’s principal reliance is upon § 10 of the Administrative Procedure Act which provides for judicial review of agency action “[ejxeept so far as (1) statutes preclude judicial revie…
• Gatling v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 286 F.2d 139 (4th Cir. 1961)
  …United States, 1954, 348 U.S. 121, 75 S.Ct. 127, 99 L.Ed. 150; Lipsitz v. Commissioner, 4 Cir., 1955, 220 F. 2d 871, certiorari denied 350 U.S. 845, 76 S.Ct. 87, 100 L.Ed. 753; Shahadi v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 1959, 266 F. 2d 495, certiorari denied 361 U.S. 874, 80 S.Ct. 137, 4 L.Ed.2d 113; Rogers v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 1940, 111 F. 2d 987; Drieborg v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 1955, 225 F. 2d 216; Kurnick v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 1956, 232 F. 2d 678; Schwarzkopf v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 1957, 246 F. 2d 731;…