TAHIR

v.

LEHMANN, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE

Citator

Cited By

• In re S & E Shipping Corp. v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co., 678 F.2d 636 (6th Cir. 1982)
  …the district court); Cox v. General Elec. Co., 302 F. 2d 389 (6th Cir. 1962) (failure of the trial transcript to disclose what actually happened in the district court); Superior Mfg. Co. v. Hessler Mfg. Co., 267 F. 2d 302 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 876, 80 S.Ct. 139, 4 L.Ed.2d 115 (1959) (resolving a conflict between a party’s recollection of events and the recorder’s trial transcript). . Although the filing of a notice of appeal generally ends the district court’s jurisdiction and transfers juri…
• United States ex rel. Ronald H. Connelly v. Cormier, 279 F.2d 37 (5th Cir. 1960)
  …. Other than those involving “special circumstances.” See Darr v. Burford, 1950, 339 U.S. 200, 210, 70 S.Ct. 587, 94 L.Ed. 761; Weston v. Sigler, 1959, 361 U.S. 37, 80 S.Ct. 141, 4 L.Ed.2d 111, considered in connection with Weston v. Walker, 1959, 361 U.S. 876, 80 S.Ct. 141, 4 L.Ed.2d 115. . See Irvin v. Dowd, 1959, 350 U.S. 394, 405, 79 S.Ct. 825, 3 L.Ed.2d 900.…