AMERICAN SIGN AND INDICATOR CORP.

v.

SCHULENBURG ET AL., DOING BUSINESS AS TIME-O-MATIC COMPANY, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Textile Workers Union OF Am., AFL-CIO v. Am. Thread Co., 291 F.2d 894 (4th Cir. 1961)
  …promise to abide by the arbitrator’s award. Textile Workers Union of America v. Lincoln Mills, 1957, 353 U.S. 448, 77 S.Ct. 912, 923, 1 L.Ed.2d 972; Textile Workers Union of America v. Cone Mills Corp., 4 Cir., 1959, 268 F. 2d 920, certiorari denied 361 U.S. 886, 80 S.Ct. 157, 4 L.Ed.2d 121.1 On examination of the grievance procedure in this collective bargaining agreement, it is found to be not particularly unusual. Article VI provides a four step procedure for processing grievances. The first two steps p…
• Mrs. Jessie Mae Young v. Ill. Cent. Gulf R.R. Co., 618 F.2d 332 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …defendant by their admission. The trial court erred in failing to admit this and all of the previously discussed evidence relating to the poor condition of the crossing. See Cain v. Illinois Central Railroad, 266 F. 2d 942 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 886, 80 S.Ct. 158, 4 L.Ed.2d 122 (1959). Jury Instructions and Evidentiary Rulings Relating to Negligence in Operation of Train The trial court erred in excluding other evidence which, if properly admitted, would indicate that one of his jury instruct…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Gen. Radio Co. v. The Superior Elec. Co., 321 F.2d 857 (3d Cir. 1963)
  …eral Electric Co., 283 U.S. 664, 51 S.Ct. 563, 75 L.Ed. 1339 (1931); Risdon Iron & Locomotive Works v. Medart, 158 U.S. 68, 15 S.Ct. 745, 39 L.Ed. 899 (1895); American Sign & Indicator Corp. v. Schulenburg, 267 F. 2d 388 (7th Cir., 1959), cert. den. 361 U.S. 886, 80 S.Ct. 157, 4 L.Ed.2d 121 (1959); Application of Lawson, 228 F. 2d 249 (C.C.P.A., 1955). It has been recognized since Knapp v. Morss, 150 U.S. 221, 14 S.Ct. 81, 37 L.Ed. 1059, decided in 1893, that patentable in vention consists in the embodime…