UNITED STATES

v.

ALABAMA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Commc'ns Workers of Am., Afl-Cio v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 362 U.S. 479 (U.S. 1960)
  …deleting the words “in any manner.” 266 F. 2d 823. Because of an asserted conflict with the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Labor Board v. Local 926, Int. Union of Operating Engrs., 267 F. 2d 418, we brought the case here. 361 U. S. 893. The only challenge here to the order as so amended is to its validity as extended to “any other employer,” as well as the telephone company. Petitioners were not found to have engaged in violations against the employees of any employer other than…
• Marine Cooks & Stewards v. Panama S.S. Co., Ltd., 362 U.S. 365 (U.S. 1960)
  …tion and upheld the injunction.6 That court's view was based almost entirely upon our holding in Benz v. Compania Naviera Hidalgo, 353 U. S. 138. Certiorari was granted to consider the question of the applicability of the Norris-LaGuardia Act here, 361 U. S. 893, and in Order of Railroad Telegraphers [*369] v. Chicago & North Western R. Co., 361 U. S. 809, decided this day, ante, p. 330. We think neither the holding nor the opinion in the Benz case supports the narrow construction the Court of Appeals gave…
• United States v. Alabama, 362 U.S. 602 (U.S. 1960)
  …Rights Act of 1957 did not authorize this action against the State. 171 F. Supp. 720. The Court of Appeals, sustaining each of these holdings, affirmed. 267 [*604] P. 2d 808. Because of the importance of the issues involved we brought the case here. 361 U. S. 893. Shortly before the case was heard in this Court on May 2, 1960, Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1960. The bill was signed by the President on May 6, 1960, and has now become law. Act of May 6, 1960, 74 Stat. 86. Among other things § 601 (b…