AMERICAN SECURIT CO.

v.

SHATTERPROOF GLASS CORP.

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• United States v. Demko, 385 U.S. 149 (U.S. 1966)
  …S. 831; Rizzuto v. United States, 298 F. 2d 748; Lowe v. United States, 292 F. 2d 501; Somma v. United States, 283 F. 2d 149; Mills v. Panama Canal Co., 272 F. 2d 37, cert. denied, 362 U. S. 961; United States v. Forfari, 268 F. 2d 29, cert. denied, 361 U. S. 902; Balancio v. United States, 267 F. 2d 135, cert. denied, 361 U. S. 875; Aubrey v. United States, 103 U. S. App. D. C. 65, 254 F. 2d 768; United States v. Firth, 207 F. 2d 665; Lewis v. United States, 89 U. S. App. D. C. 21, 190 F. 2d 22, cert. d…
• McCULLOUGH Tool Co. v. Well Surveys, Inc., 343 F.2d 381 (10th Cir. 1965)
  …Products, Inc., 6 Cir., 271 F. 2d 146, cert. denied, 361 U.S. 964, 85 S.Ct. 93, 4 L.Ed. 2d 545; Ar-Tik Systems, Inc. v. Dairy Queen, Inc., 3 Cir., 302 F. 2d 496; American Securit Co. v. Shatterproof Glass Corp., 3 Cir., 268 F. 2d 769, cert. denied, 361 U.S. 902, 80 S.Ct. 210, 4 L.Ed.2d 157. We certainly recognize the principles enunciated in Brulotte and the other cases but think there are important distinctions between those cases, on the one hand, and the Hazeltine case and this case, on the other. In B…
• Kuehnert v. Texstar Corp., 412 F.2d 700 (5th Cir. 1969)
  …when the only question is one of accounting between joint conspirators. This view is supported by the availability of an unclean hands defense in actions involving SEC proxy requirements. Gaudiosi v. Mellon, 3 Cir., 1959, 269 F. 2d 873, cert. denied 361 U.S. 902, 80 S.Ct. 211, 4 L.Ed.2d 157; Studebaker Corp. v. Allied Prods. Corp., W.D.Mich., 1966, 256 F.Supp. 173, 192; cf. Union Pac. RR. v. Chicago & N. W. Ry., N.D.Ill., 1964, 226 F.Supp. 400. See also 2 L. Loss, Securities Regulation 955-56 (2d ed. 1961…