CUNNINGHAM

v.

ENGLISH ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Bakery & Confectionery Workers Int'l Union of Am. v. Mozart G. Ratner, 335 F.2d 691 (D.C. Cir. 1964)
  …rt, the situation here is clearly distinguishable. . English v. Cunningham, 106 U.S.App. D.C. 70, 74, 269 F. 2d 517, 521 (1959). . Ibid., cert. denied, 361 U.S. 897, 80 S. Ct. 195, 4 L.Ed.2d 152 (1959), and memorandum of Mr. Justice Frankfurter at 361 U.S. 905, 909-910, 80 S.Ct. 187, 188, 189. . He found that there was “no basis * * * for withholding payment of the fees,” but added “as billed,” i. e. per the retainer agreement. This latter phase has been discussed, text supra. . Cf. Angoff v. Goldfine,…
• Env't Def. Fund, Inc. v. Costle, 636 F.2d 1229 (D.C. Cir. 1980)
  …with the problem that were considered,” the “economic consequences of each of these alternatives,” and “the reasons for choosing one alternative over the others.” Id. . Appellants cite Cunningham v. English, 269 F. 2d 539 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 905, 80 S.Ct. 195, 4 L.Ed.2d 152 (1959), as an illustration of this principle. . See Part II-D infra. . Appellants’ notice and comment arguments are sometimes presented as objections to the original settlement agreement as well as the modifications. S…
• Godfrey P. Schmidt v. McCARTHY, 369 F.2d 176 (D.C. Cir. 1966)
  …ps, representing more than one million members of the International, to intervene and to participate by counsel in accordance with our directive. See note 6, supra. . Supra note 1. . And see Memorandum of Frankfurter, J., in English v. Cunningham, 361 U.S. 905, 907, 910, 80 S.Ct. 195 (1959). . Supra note 1. . Milone v. English, supra note 1, 113 U.S.App.D.C. at 212, 306 F. 2d at 819. Thus this court noted that the trial judge had denied the motion filed by the ap-pellees “insofar as it sought an award o…