P. LORILLARD CO. ET AL.

v.

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Citator

Cited By

• Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Duberstein et ux., 363 U.S. 278 (U.S. 1960)
  …in conflict, petitioned for certiorari in No. 376, and acquiesced in the taxpayer’s petition in No. 546. On this basis, and because of the importance of’the question in the administration of the income tax laws, we granted certiorari in both cases. 361 U. S. 923. The exclusion of property acquired by gift from gross income under the federal income tax laws was made in the first income tax statute4 passed under the authority of the Sixteenth Amendment, and has been a feature of the income tax statutes ever…
• United States v. Cannelton Sewer Pipe Co., 364 U.S. 76 (U.S. 1960)
  …ines to produce a commercially marketable mineral product, it does not embrace the fabrication of the mineral product into finished articles. In view of the importance of the question to taxpayers as well as to the Government, we granted certiorari. 361 U. S. 923. We disagree with respondent’s contention that the issue is not presented by this record, and we therefore reach the merits. We have concluded that, under the mandate of the statute, respondent’s “gross income from mining” under the findings here is…
• United States v. Hoffa, 349 F.2d 20 (6th Cir. 1965)
  …ence his testimony, and allowed a wide latitude with respect to many other matters. It was within the discretion of the Court to limit cross-examination relative to collateral matters. Lohman v. United States, 266 F. 2d 3 (C.A. 6, 1959) cert. denied 361 U.S. 923, 80 S.Ct. 290, 4 L.Ed. 2d 239. We find no error in the admission of the Government’s rebuttal testimony concerning Partin’s reputation for truth and veracity. [*47] 2 Privilege of Mrs. Partin The defense called Mrs. Par-tin as a witness for the pu…