STEWART

v.

THOMAS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Garrett v. Morris Kirschman & Co., Inc., 336 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 1976)
  ….W. 2d 101 (1965) cert. den., 383 U.S. 916, 86 S.Ct. 910, 15 L.Ed.2d 671 (1966); Smith v. Bergmann, 377 S.W. 2d 519 (Mo.App.1964); Carter v. Carter, 187 Kan. 74, 353 P. 2d 499 (1960); Smith v. State, 205 Tenn. 502, 327 S.W. 2d 308 (1959), cert. den. 361 U.S. 930, 80 S.Ct. 372, 4 L.Ed.2d 354 (1960). But cf. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Nobles, 202 So. 2d 603 (Fla.App. 1st Dist., 1967). As a corollary to the rules allowing such wide latitude in the choice of writings as mnemonic aids, the writings used…
• Ogden v. Zuckert, 298 F.2d 312 (D.C. Cir. 1961)
  ….Ct. 322, 90 L.Ed. 318, and cases there referred to; Smithmeyer v. United States, 147 U.S. 342, 358, 13 S.Ct. 321, 37 L.Ed. 196; Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. v. Aircoach Transp. Ass’n, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 355, 363-364, 253 F. 2d 877, 885-886, cert. denied, 361 U.S. 930, 80 S.Ct. 372, 4 L.Ed.2d 354; Capital Transit Co. v. Safeway Trails, Inc., 92 U.S.App.D.C. 20, 201 F. 2d 708; Hardy v. Rossell, 135 F.Supp. 260, 267-268 (S.D.N.Y. 1955). We conclude that jurisdiction of the court was not precluded by the omission o…
• United States v. Bessemer & Lake Erie R.R. Co., 717 F.2d 593 (D.C. Cir. 1983)
  …iolates the antitrust laws but whether the railroads have used the rate conferences to fix rates by coercion and to discriminate against Georgia.”). . H.R.Rep. No. 1100, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. 5 (1947). . 253 F. 2d 877 (D.C.Cir.1958), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 930, 80 S.Ct. 372, 4 L.Ed.2d 354 (1960). . Id. at 887. . Reply Brief for Appellant at 27. . Indictment at ¶ 22; JA at 50. . Id. (describing the specific goals of the conspiracy). . Id at ¶ 23(d). . Brief for United States of America at 42. . Repl…