HARRIS

v.

TEXAS

Citator

Cited By (37 total)

• Austin v. State, 160 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)
  …d testimony was used, it is necessary for the motion to show that the testimony was perjured and that the prosecuting officials, at the time of its use, knew it was perjured. See Black v. United States, 9 Cir. 1959, 269 F. 2d 38, cert. denied, 1960, 361 U.S. 938, 80 S.Ct. 379, 4 L.Ed.2d 357; Enzor v. United States, 5 Cir. 1961, 296 F. 2d 62, cert. denied, 1962, 369 U.S. 854, 82 S.Ct. 940, 8 L.Ed.2d 12; United States v. Daniels, D.C.E.D.Pa.1961, 191 F.Supp. 129; also see 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (Supp.1963), note…
• Nelson v. State, 208 So. 2d 506 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968)
  …o justify the vacation of a criminal judgment it seems clear that the showing at the hearing must be that the ‘attorney’s conduct was so incompetent that it made the trial a farce,’ Black v. United States, (9 Cir., 1959) 269 F. 2d 38, 42; cert. den. 361 U.S. 938, 80 S.Ct. 379, 4 L.Ed.2d 357; Latimer v. Cranor, (9 Cir., 1954) 214 F. 2d 926; (habeas corpus); Mitchell v. United States (supra). Washington v. United States, (9 Cir., 1962) 297 F. 2d 342; cert. den. 370 U.S. 949, 82 S.Ct. 1597, 8 L.Ed.2d 815, requ…
• Hall v. State, 162 So. 2d 324 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)
  …ed testimony was used, it is necessary for the motion to show that the testimony was perjured and that the prosecuting officials, at the time of its use, knew it was perjured. See Black v. United States, 9 Cir.1959, 269 F. 2d 38, cert. denied, 1960, 361 U.S. 938, 80 S.Ct 379, 4 L.Ed.2d 357; Enzor v. United States, 5 Cir.1961, 296 F. 2d 62, cert. denied, 1962, 369 U.S. [*325] 854, 82 S.Ct. 940, 8 L.Ed.2d 12; United States v. Daniels, D.C.E.D.Pa.1961, 191 F.Supp. 129; also see 28 U.S.C.A., § 2255 (Supp.1963),…