MCGANN
v.
UNITED STATES
MCGANN
UNITED STATES
362 U.S. 309
Supreme Court of the United States (1960)
Caution
Also reported at: 4 L. Ed. 2d 734 · 80 S. Ct. 725 · 1960 U.S. LEXIS 1415 · SCDB 1959-057
Cited by 9 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. Upon the suggestion of the Solicitor General that inasmuch as the petitioner had been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis by the District Court, the application to the Court of Appeals was unnecessary, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that Court for further proceedings.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cruz v. Hauck, 404 U.S. 59 (U.S. 1971)…that if counsel withdrew for that reason the Court of Appeals was duty bound to replace him. We have also held that a Court of Appeals may not overrule the permission granted by a District Court to proceed in forma pauperis, McGann v. United States, 362 U. S. 309 (1960), but that a Court of Appeals must review de novo a trial judge’s certification that an appeal would not be in good faith, Johnson v. United States, 352 U. S. 565 (1957). Moreover, in federal criminal appeals on direct review most circuits ha…
-
Byrd v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 1518 (U.S. 2018)
-
Perkins v. Cingliano, 296 F.2d 567 (4th Cir. 1961)…f costs incident to the appeal, both those payable to the Clerk of the District Court for making up the record and those payable to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals as filing fees. This case is significantly different from McGann v. United States, 362 U.S. 309, 80 S.Ct. 725, 4 L.Ed.2d 734 (1960), where the District Judge had granted the petitioner leave to appeal1 in forma pauperis, and the Supreme Court held that the petitioner was entitled to have his appeal docketed without making further application t…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence