UNITED RUBBER, CORK, LINOLEUM & PLASTIC WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, ET AL.

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

Citator

Cited By

• Edward J. Debartolo Corp. v. Fla. Gulf Coast Bldg. & Constr. Trades Council, 485 U.S. 568 (U.S. 1988)
  …atronize” lists was coercive. NLRB v. International Assn. of Machinists, 263 F. 2d 796 (1959), cert. denied, 362 U. S. 940 (1960). The Board suggests that NLRB v. United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers, 269 F. 2d 694, 701 (CA4 1959), rev’d, 362 U. S. 329 (1960), is to the contrary, but the opinion in that case focused on handbilling combined with picketing; and it was the Ninth Circuit case that was later referred to on the Senate floor in reference to nonpicketing appeals. See n. 8, infra. Contrar…
• Int'l Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Afl-Cio v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 280 F.2d 616 (D.C. Cir. 1960)
  …isions of the Supreme Court in N. L. R. B. v. Drivers, Chauffeurs, Helpers, Local Union No. 639, 362 U.S. 274, 80 S.Ct. 706, 4 L.Ed.2d 710, referred to as the Curtis case, and United Rubber Cork, Linoleum and Plastic Workers, etc. v. N. L. R. B., 362 U.S. 329, 80 S.Ct. 759, 4 L.Ed.2d 768. The Court held in these cases that peaceful picketing, or a peaceful strike, by a union which did not represent a majority of the employees, to obtain immediate recognition as the exclusive bargaining agent in Curtis, o…
• Int'l Ass'n OF MacHinists, Local Lodge NO. 311, AFL-CIO v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 289 F.2d 451 (D.C. Cir. 1961)
  …this case is whether picketing and the [listing] by a minority union [under the circumstances] is a violation of Section 8(b) (1) (A) of the * * * Act.” And see United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers v. National Labor Relations Board, 1960, 362 U.S. 329, 80 S.Ct. 759, 4 L.Ed.2d 768. . Board’s brief. . Penn Oil Co. v. Vacuum Oil Co., 1931, 60 App.D.C. 96, 99, 48 F. 2d 1008, 1011; 2 Wigmore, Evidence §§ 382, 437 (3d ed. 1940). . Cf. National Labor Relations Board v. Local 50, Bakery & Confectioner…

  ← 1 / 2 →