MCMORRAN, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC WORKS OF NEW YORK,

v.

TUSCARORA NATION OF INDIANS, ALSO KNOWN AS TUSCARORA INDIAN NATION

Citator

Cited By

• Oneida Indian Nation of New York v. Cnty. of Oneida, 414 U.S. 661 (U.S. 1974)
  …and which was based on the Power Authority’s abandonment of its appropriation proceedings in favor of the condemnation suit, vacated the Court of Appeals’ judgment and remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the complaint as moot. 362 U. S. 608 (1960). See Records and Briefs in No. 384, O. T. 1958; Records and Briefs in No. 4, O. T. 1959. See, e. g., Gold-Washing & Water Co. v. Keyes, 96 U. S. 199 (1878); Florida C. & P. R. Co. v. Bell, 176 U. S. 321 (1900); Filhiol v. Maurice, 185 U. S.…
• Ga. Power Co. v. 54.20 Acres OF Land, 563 F.2d 1178 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …When it condemns land under Section 21, a licensee acts as the agent of the United States government. Tuscarora Nation of Indians v. Power Authority, 2 Cir. 1958, 257 F. 2d 885, 894, vacated as moot sub nom, McMorran v. Tuscarora Nation of Indians, 362 U.S. 608, 80 S.Ct. 960, 4 L.Ed.2d 1009. This delegation of federal power is constitutional. Missouri v. Union Electric Light & Power Co., C.D.Mo.1930, 42 F. 2d 692; see Thatcher v. Tennessee Gas Transmission Co., 5 Cir. 1950, 180 F. 2d 644, cert. denied, 340…
• The United States v. The Oneida Nation OF NEW York, 477 F.2d 939 (Ct. Cl. 1973)
  …ts of Appeals held the Trade and Intercourse Act applicable to condemnations by the state. Tuscarora Nation of Indians v. Power [*944] Authority, 257 F. 2d 885 (2nd Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 841, 79 S.Ct. 66, 3 L.Ed.2d 76, appeal dismissed, 362 U.S. 608, 80 S.Ct. 960, 4 L.Ed.2d 1009 (1960); Tuscarora Indian Nation v. Federal Power Comm’n, 105 U.S.App.D.C. 146, 265 F. 2d 338, 339 (1958), rev’d on other grounds, 362 U.S. 99, 80 S.Ct. 543, 4 L.Ed.2d 584 (1960). . Supra, note 4. . It was not necessar…