KONIGSBERG

v.

STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal., 366 U.S. 36 (U.S. 1961)
  …full investigation into his qualifications.2 The California Supreme Court, by a divided vote, refused review, and also denied Konigsberg’s motion for direct admission to practice.3 52 Cal. 2d 769, [*40] 344 P. 2d 777. We again brought the case here. 362 U. S. 910. Petitioner’s contentions in this Court in support of reversal of the California Supreme Court’s order are reducible to three propositions: (1) the State’s action was inconsistent with this Court’s decision in the earlier Konigsberg case; (2) assum…
• California v. Southland Royalty Co., 436 U.S. 519 (U.S. 1978)
  …merely leasing its properties to a carrier, becomes a ‘carrier by railroad,’ thus subjecting itself to an obligation to carry on the operations of its lessee’s railroad . . . .” Meyers v. Famous Realty, Inc., 271 F. 2d 811, 814 (1959), cert. denied, 362 U. S. 910;22 [*544] see also City of New York v. United States, 337 F. Supp. 150, 153 (EDNY 1972) (three-judge panel); Friendly, Amendment of the Railroad Reorganization Act, 36 Colum. L. Rev. 27, 47-49 (1936). Thus, instead of supporting the petitioners’ pos…
• McNEAL v. Culver, 365 U.S. 109 (U.S. 1961)
  …portions of the record, are such as entitled him to a full hearing thereon, and, if so and if those allegations be found true, whether petitioner was denied due process of law guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. 362 U. S. 910. It is thoroughly settled that: “ Where the gravity of the crime and other factors — such as the age and education of the defendant, the conduct of the court or the prosecuting officials, and the complicated nature of the offense charged and the p…