JOSEPH GROCHOWSKI, PETITIONER,

v.

PALM BEACH COUNTY ASSOCIATION FOR RETARDED CHILDREN, SECURITY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, AND THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• Franklin v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 566 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
  …by putting a matter in issue, as in Tootle v. Seaboard Coastline Railroad Co., 468 So. 2d 237 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), nor compelled production of pertinent, medical reports and records in workers’ compensation cases, as in Kirk v. Publix Super Markets, 185 So. 2d 161 (Fla.1966), overcomes the more specific proscription against unauthorized communication as reflected in section 455.-241(2). As in Campbell v. Wendy’s of South Florida, 495 So. 2d 890 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), where this court concluded that an employer…
• Horizon Healthcare & U.S.F. & G. v. Murphy, 660 So. 2d 1065 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)
  …certify the facts to the court having jurisdiction in the place in which it is sitting, which shall thereupon ... punish ... in the same manner and to the same extent as for contempt.... ” The Florida Supreme Court, in Kirk v. Publix Super Markets, 185 So. 2d 161 (Fla.1966), held that a deputy commissioner lacks authority to dismiss a claim and should certify enforcement problems to the circuit court for sanctions pursuant to section 440.33(2). The Florida Supreme Court however subsequently adopted rule 4.15…
• John Gaul Constr. Co. & Highlands Ins. Co. v. Leslie Harbin & the Indus. Relations Comm'n, 247 So. 2d 33 (Fla. 1971)
  …though no prior order had been or was entered by him compelling claimant to keep the medical appointments or to attend to his deposition. The Commission reversed the dismissal order solely on the authority of Kirk v. Publix Super Markets, Fla.1966, 185 So. 2d 161, with remand for further proceedings in accordance with the holding in that case. Such remand signifies that the stated failures of claimant should be certified to the Circuit Court pursuant to Section 440.33(2), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., for contem…