GINSBURG

v.

GOURLEY, CHIEF JUDGE, U. S. DISTRICT COURT

Citator

Cited By

• Times Film Corp. v. City OF Chicago, 365 U.S. 43 (U.S. 1961)
  …e case presented merely an abstract question of law since neither the film nor evidence of its content was submitted. 272 F. 2d 90. The precise question at issue here never having [*45] been specifically decided by this Court, we granted certiorari, 362 U. S. 917 (1960). We are satisfied that a justiciable controversy exists. The section of Chicago’s ordinance in controversy specifically provides that a permit for the public exhibition of a motion picture must be obtained; that such “permit shall be granted…
• McPHAUL v. United States, 364 U.S. 372 (U.S. 1960)
  …a when he appeared before the said subcommittee.” The jury found petitioner guilty, and he was fined the sum of $500 and sentenced to imprisonment for a period of nine months. The Court of Appeals affirmed, 272 F, 2d 627, and we granted certiorari, 362 U. S. 917. Petitioner’s principal contentions here are that there was no evidence showing that the records called for by the subpoena were in existence or, if it may be said that there was, that those records were in petitioner’s possession or subject to his…
• Grundler v. State OF N.C., 283 F.2d 798 (4th Cir. 1960)
  …reviewed the trial proceedings, found no reversible ■error, and affirmed the convictions. State v. Grundler, 1959, 251 N.C. 177, 111 S.E. 2d 1. The Supreme Court of the United States later denied certiorari. Grundler et al. v. North Carolina, 1960, 362 U.S. 917, 80 S.Ct. 670, 4 L.Ed.2d 738. Grundler and Jelly then petitioned the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina for a writ of habeas corpus. The District Judge, having before him the record of the proceedings in the sta…