MURYN
v.
NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO.
MURYN
NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO.
362 U.S. 918
Supreme Court of the United States (1960)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Rugendorf, 316 F.2d 589 (7th Cir. 1963)…ant, who participated in the transaction charged in the indictment. He was the only witness other than the defendant who could have disclosed entrapment, if any. In Jones v. United States, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 228, 271 F. 2d 494, 496, fn. 3, cert. den. 362 U.S. 918, 80 S.Ct. 674, 4 L.Ed.2d 741, the Court had for decision the question of whether it was error to fail to disclose the name of the confidential informant, when it was his information, relayed through another agent, that was the basis of establishing…