INTERNATIONAL TERMINAL OPERATING CO., INC.,

v.

WATERMAN STEAMSHIP CO.

Citator

Cited By (34 total)

• Clipper Exxpress v. Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau, Inc., 690 F.2d 1240 (9th Cir. 1982)
  …that in order to suspend the running of the 30-day appeal period allowed by Rule 73(a) a motion for new trial [*1250] need not be granted or even grantable.” Yanow v. Weyerhaeuser S.S. Co., 274 F. 2d 274, 283 (9th Cir. 1959) (en banc), cert. denied, 362 U.S. 919, 80 S.Ct. 671, 4 L.Ed.2d 739 (1960). Under this liberal approach, Clipper’s motion was clearly sufficient to toll the time for filing a Notice of Appeal. . Because we hold that the record before the trial judge at the time the summary judgment was…
• Blisscraft OF Hollywood v. United Plastics Co., 294 F.2d 694 (2d Cir. 1961)
  …ablished either (1) palming off by defendant, (2) actual deception of purchasers, or (3) a violation by defendant of plaintiff’s property rights. Norwich Pharmacal Co. v. Sterling Drug, Inc., 2 Cir., 1959, 271 F. 2d 569, 571, certiorari denied 1960, 362 U.S. 919, 80 S.Ct. 671, 4 L.Ed.2d 739. Here, the record fails to disclose any evidence of palming off or actual deception. Nor has it been shown that defendant violated any of plaintiff’s property rights in the presently recognized unfair competition sense o…
• United States v. Wilson, 690 F.2d 1267 (9th Cir. 1982)
  …ciencies in pro se pleadings more readily overlooked than similar deficiencies in papers prepared by a lawyer); Rabin v. Cohen, 570 F. 2d 864, 866 (9th Cir. 1978); Yanow v. Weyerhaeuser Steamship Co., 274 F. 2d 274, 283 (9th Cir. 1959) cert. denied, 362 U.S. 919, 80 S.Ct. 671, 4 L.Ed.2d 739 (1960) (appeals that give proper notice are generally allowed even though improperly labeled or filed in the wrong court). The district court did neither. Instead, the district judge’s clerk proposed in a memorandum to…