WILLIAMS

v.

CALIFORNIA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Smith v. United States, 358 F.2d 833 (D.C. Cir. 1966)
  …e rather than that of only the officer who performs the act of arresting. Samuel J. D. Williams v. United States, 113 U.S. App.D.C. 371, 308 F. 2d 326 (1962); Anderson Jones v. United States, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 228, 271 F. 2d 494 (1959), cert. denied, 362 U.S. 944, 80 S.Ct. 809, 4 L.Ed.2d 771 (1960). Accord, United States v. Bianco, 189 F. 2d 716 (3d Cir. 1951). Appellant fails in his efforts to distinguish these cases. Moreover, Appellant’s reasoning suffers from a more basic fallacy than adverse precedent.…
• United States v. Wysocki, 457 F.2d 1155 (5th Cir. 1972)
  …e as a law enforcement officer. Courts exercise a broad sound discretion in passing upon the qualifications of an expert. Wolford v. United States, 401 F. 2d 331 (10th Cir. 1968); DeFreese v. United States, 270 F. 2d 737 (5th Cir. 1959) cert. denied 362 U.S. 944, 80 S.Ct. 810, 4 L.Ed.2d 772 (1960). Witnesses of proved experience in a trade or business with respect to which opinion evidence is desired are ordinarily considered qualified to testify as to such opinions. Ignacio v. People of Territory of Guam,…
• Bendelow v. United States, 418 F.2d 42 (5th Cir. 1969)
  …ited with approval in [*51] McCormick, Evidence, § 43, at 91 (1954) (conviction too remote in time); Lloyd v. United States, 226 F. 2d 9 (5th Cir. 1955) (prosecution’s use of charts) ; De Freese v. United States, 270 F. 2d 730 (5th Cir.), cert. den. 362 U.S. 944, 80 S.Ct. 810, 44 L.Ed.2d 772 (1959) (qualifications of expert witness for prosecution) ; Beck v. United States, 317 F. 2d 865 (5th Cir.), cert. den. 375 U.S. 972, 84 S.Ct. 480, 11 L.Ed.2d 419, rehearing denied, 376 U.S. 929, 84 S.Ct. 656, 11 L.Ed.2…