BRADEN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Two Guys from Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. McGinley, 366 U.S. 582 (U.S. 1961)
  …rney was expiring within a month of the decision, there was no basis for finding that there would be future discriminatory enforcement of the 1959 statute, 179 F. Supp. 944. On appeal brought under 28 U. S. C. § 1253, we noted probable jurisdiction. 362 U. S. 960. I. Before reaching the primary questions presented, several ancillary matters must be considered. First, appellant contends that McGinley discriminated against it in enforcing the laws. Recognizing that a mootness problem exists because Lehigh Co…
• Braden v. United States, 365 U.S. 431 (U.S. 1961)
  …g violated 2 U. S. C. § 192, in refusing to answer six specific questions which had been put to him by the subcommittee.1 The Court of Appeals affirmed, 272 F. 2d 653, relying on Barenblatt v. United States, 360 U. S. 109, and we granted certiorari, 362 U. S. 960. The principal issues raised by the petitioner are substantially identical to those considered in Wilkinson, and extended discussion is not required in resolving them. Based upon the same record that was brought here in Wilkinson, we conclude for t…