UNITED STATES
v.
LUCCHESE, ALIAS LUCKESE, ALIAS LUCASE, ALIAS ARRA, ALIAS LUCHESE; AND COSTELLO V. UNITED STATES
UNITED STATES
LUCCHESE, ALIAS LUCKESE, ALIAS LUCASE, ALIAS ARRA, ALIAS LUCHESE; AND COSTELLO V. UNITED STATES
362 U.S. 973
Supreme Court of the United States (1960)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Costello v. United States, 365 U.S. 265 (U.S. 1961)…al estate.” The District Court found that this was “willful misrepresentation and fraud” and that “his true occupation was bootlegging,” 171 F. Supp. 10, 16. The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed, 275 F. 2d 355. We granted certiorari. 362 U. S. 973. An earlier denaturalization complaint brought under 8 U. S. C. (1946 ed.) § 738 (a), the predecessor of § 340 (a), was dismissed on the ground that wiretapping may have infected both the Government’s affidavit of good cause and its evidence. Unite…