IN RE BROCK

U.S. | 1960-05-16
No. 678
362 U.S. 978 Supreme Court of the United States (1960) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Jobson v. Henne, 355 F.2d 129 (2d Cir. 1966)
    …th Amendment has no bearing on the legality of the imprisonment of persons duly convicted of a crime; such persons are explicitly excepted from the Amendment’s coverage. United States ex rel. Smith v. Dowd, 271 F. 2d 292 (7 Cir. 1959), cert. denied, 362 U.S. 978, 80 S.Ct. 1063, 4 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1960). On a record so devoid of facts it is clearly impossible at this time to resolve the merits of appellant’s constitutional claim that as an inmate at the Newark State School he was forced to work under condition…
  • Baker v. Duckworth, 752 F.2d 302 (7th Cir. 1985)
    …tional punishment for his previous offenses, or punishment for his recidivist status as such, but rather receives a more severe punishment for his most recent felonious offense. United States v. Dowd, 271 F. 2d 292, 295 (7th Cir.1959), cert. denied, 362 U.S. 978, 80 S.Ct. 1063, 4 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1960); Collins v. Duckworth, 559 F.Supp. 541, 543 (N.D.Ind.1983); Smith v. State, 422 N.E. 2d 1179, 1186 (Ind.1981). The use of prior convictions to enhance a convict’s sentence in this manner does not violate the gu…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw