FEDERAL BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC.,
v.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ET AL.; TUCKER V. ILLINOIS; SMITH ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES EX REL. HELWIG V. MARONEY, SUPERINTENDENT, WESTERN STATE PENITENTIARY; WHITING V. SACKS, WARDEN; LIVESAY V. ELLIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; MACKIEWICZ V. FLORIDA
FEDERAL BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC.,
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ET AL.; TUCKER V. ILLINOIS; SMITH ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES EX REL. HELWIG V. MARONEY, SUPERINTENDENT, WESTERN STATE PENITENTIARY; WHITING V. SACKS, WARDEN; LIVESAY V. ELLIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; MACKIEWICZ V. FLORIDA
362 U.S. 992
Supreme Court of the United States (1960)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Molitor, 337 F.2d 917 (9th Cir. 1964)…urisdiction upon this Court to consider such appeal. Smith v. Stone, 308 F. 2d 15, 17 (9th Cir. 1962); Smith v. United States, 272 F. 2d 228, 229 (9th Cir. 1959), certiorari denied, 362 U.S. 954, 80 S.Ct. 868, 4 L.Ed.2d 871 (1960), rehearing denied, 362 U.S. 992, 80 S.Ct. 1080, 4 L.Ed.2d 1024 (1960); Stafford v. Russell, 220 F. 2d 853, 854 (9th Cir. 1955); Fern v. United States, 213 F. 2d 674, 676, 15 Alaska 31 (9th Cir. 1954). Molitor’s cross-appeal must be and is hereby dismissed on the ground that this…
-
Smith v. Harris, 351 F.2d 309 (8th Cir. 1965)…9 F. 2d 125, rehearing denied 259 F. 2d 125; Smith v. United States, D.C.S.D.Cal., Central Div., 1959, 174 F. [*310] Supp. 828, appeals dismissed, 9 Cir., 272 F. 2d 228, certiorari denied, 362 U.S. 954, 80 S.Ct. 868, 4 L.Ed.2d 871, rehearing denied, 362 U.S. 992, 80 S.Ct. 1080, 4 L.Ed.2d 1024; Smith v. United States, D.C.S.D.Cal., Central Div., 1961, 216 F.Supp. 809; Smith v. Settle, 1961, 368 U.S. 807, 82 S.Ct. 118, 7 L.Ed.2d 68 (denial of motion for leave to file petition for habeas corpus); Smith v. Sett…