GREENWALD
v.
MARYLAND

U.S. | 1960-06-20
No. 920
363 U.S. 721 Supreme Court of the United States (1960) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • DOE v. Delaware, 450 U.S. 382 (U.S. 1981)
    …want of a properly presented federal question” rather than “for want of [a] substantial federal question,” e. g., Black v. Payne, 438 U. S. 909 (1978), or “for want of a properly presented substantial federal question,” e. g., Greenwald v. Maryland, 363 U. S. 721 (1960). Appellants’ first argument “draw[s] in question the validity of a statute of [a] state on the ground of its being repugnant to the Constitution ... of the United States,” and is therefore within this Court’s appellate jurisdiction. 28 U. S.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw