MARINE COOKS & STEWARDS, AFL, ET AL.
v.
PANAMA STEAMSHIP CO., LTD., ET AL.; BURLINGTON-CHICAGO CARTAGE, INC., V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; WOLFE ET AL. V. NATIONAL LEAD CO.; HELMIG V. JONES ET AL.; SINCLAIR OIL & GAS CO. V. MASTERSON ET AL.
MARINE COOKS & STEWARDS, AFL, ET AL.
PANAMA STEAMSHIP CO., LTD., ET AL.; BURLINGTON-CHICAGO CARTAGE, INC., V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; WOLFE ET AL. V. NATIONAL LEAD CO.; HELMIG V. JONES ET AL.; SINCLAIR OIL & GAS CO. V. MASTERSON ET AL.
363 U.S. 809
Supreme Court of the United States (1960)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Radiant Burners, Inc. v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co., 364 U.S. 656 (U.S. 1961)…onversion gas burners or gas furnaces or that the public has been deprived of a product of over-all superiority.” Id., at 200. Because of petitioner’s claim that this holding is contrary to-controlling decisions of this Court, we granted certiorari. 363 U. S. 809. We think the decision of the Court of Appeals does not accord with our recent decision in Klor’s, Inc., v. Broadway-Hale Stores, 359 U. S. 207. The allegation in the complaint that “AGA and its Utility members, including Peoples and Northern, effe…
-
Bhd. OF R.R. Carmen OF Am. v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co., 354 F.2d 786 (8th Cir. 1965)…y the courts.” Accord: Sinclair Refining Co. v. Atkinson, 1962, 370 U.S. 195, 199-203, 82 S.Ct. 1328, 8 L.Ed.2d 440; Marine Cooks & Stewards, AFL v. Panama Steamship Co., Ltd., 1960, 362 U.S. 365, 369, 80 S.Ct. 779, 4 L.Ed.2d 797, rehearing denied, 363 U.S. 809, 80 S.Ct. 1235, 4 L.Ed.2d 1151. In point of fact, the courts have defined the term labor dispute as used in the Norris-LaGuardia Aet very broadly. See, e.g., Marine Cooks & Stewards, AEL v. Panama Steamship Co., Ltd., supra (picketing by American se…