KANSAS TURNPIKE AUTHORITY

v.

ABRAMSON ET AL., EXECUTORS

Citator

Cited By

• Bertot v. Sch. Dist. NO. 1, 522 F.2d 1171 (10th Cir. 1975)
  …ories and there was no expression by the Court as to the basis on which the disposition rests. . See Harris v. Tooele County School District, 471 F. 2d 218 (10th Cir.); Kansas Turnpike Authority v. Abramson, 275 F. 2d 711 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 363 U.S. 813, 80 S.Ct. 1250, 4 L.Ed.2d 1154; George R. Whitten, Jr., Inc. v. State University Construction Fund, 493 F. 2d 177 (1st Cir.). . See Moor v. County of Alameda, 411 U.S. 693, 93 S.Ct. 1785, 36 L.Ed.2d 596; City of Kenosha v. Bruno, 412 U.S. 507, 93 S…
• Cartier v. Sec'y OF State, 506 F.2d 191 (D.C. Cir. 1974)
  …, cert. denied, 395 U.S. 959, 89 S.Ct. 2100, 23 L.Ed.2d 745 (1969); Davis v. Board of Parole, 113 U.S.App.D.C. 194, 306 F. 2d 801 (1962); Gordon v. Matthews, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 400, 273 F. 2d 525 (1959), cert. denied sub nom. Frazier v. United States, 363 U.S. 813, 80 S.Ct. 1251, 4 L.Ed.2d 1155 (1960). The very same factors that indicate the impropriety of resort to mandamus reveal that the District Court should not entertain the type of action for declaratory relief that appellee claims was here granted.10…
• George R. Whitten, JR., Inc. v. State Univ. Constr. Fund, 493 F.2d 177 (1st Cir. 1974)
  …ed, 390 U.S. 1042, 88 S.Ct. 1635, 20 L.Ed.2d 303 (1967). . Krisel v. Duran, 386 F. 2d 179 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1042, 88 S.Ct. 1635, 20 L.Ed.2d 303 (1967) ; Kansas Turnpike Authority v. Abramson, 275 F. 2d 711 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 363 U.S. 813, 80 S.Ct. 1250, 4 L.Ed.2d 1154 (1960) (tending to show jurisdiction) ; State Highway Comm. v. Utah Constr. Co., 278 U.S. 194, 49 S.Ct. 104, 73 L.Ed. 262 (1929) ; Broadwater Missouri Water Users’ Assoc. v. Montana Power Co., 139 F. 2d 998 (9th Cir. 1…

  ← 1 / 3 →