UNITED STATES

v.

SAULNIER

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Trafficante, 136 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961)
  …181 F.Supp. 143. The state jurisdictions which have considered the rule are largely in accord. A contemporary case citing Frohwerk v. United States and pointing this up is Nisbet v. State, Tex.Crim.App.1959, 336 S.W. 2d 142; certiorari denied, 1960, 363 U.S. 829, 80 S.Ct. 1601, 4 L.Ed.2d 1524. This principle is comprehended within the statement -of the Florida Supreme Court in [*267] the case of Brown v. State, 1938, 130 Fla. 479, 178 So. 153, 156, citing the Frohwerk decision and adhering to the views the…
• Emil Richard Yates v. United States, 308 F.2d 737 (10th Cir. 1962)
  …, by an appeal from the order revoking probation and imposing sentence. It is a familiar rule that the taking of an appeal within the prescribed time is mandatory and jurisdictional. Wilkinson v. United States, 10 Cir., 278 F. 2d 604, cert. denied, 363 U.S. 829, 80 S.Ct. 1600, 4 L.Ed.2d 1524; Batson v. United States, 10 Cir., 129 F. 2d 463. If no appeal is taken within the time prescribed in Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C., the judgment of conviction and the sentence becomes f…
• Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. The United States, 553 F.2d 69 (Cl. Ct. 1977)
  …combination with a conventional radar range system for additionally determining target height. A combination of old elements to produce a new and useful result is patentable. Saulnier v. United States, 180 F.Supp. 412, 148 Ct.Cl. 507, cert. denied, 363 U.S. 829, 80 S.Ct. 1601, 4 L.Ed.2d 1525 (1960); Zonolite Co. v. United States, 149 F.Supp. 953, 138 Ct.Cl. 114 (1957); Badowski v. United States, 140 F.Supp. 544, 135 Ct.Cl. 93 (1956). Several factors compel this conclusion. Prior to the Richter invention,…