SMITH

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (32 total)

• United States v. Bowen, 500 F.2d 960 (9th Cir. 1974)
  …rt on numerous occasions1 with no hint that the practice was constitutionally infirm. For us to reverse ourselves at this late date requires clear and convincing reasons. See Smith v. United States, 273 F. 2d 462, 465 (10th Cir. 1959), cert. denied, 363 U.S. 846, 80 S.Ct. 1619, 4 L.Ed.2d 1729 (1960). I fail to see them in the majority decision. The only apparent change is the opinion, or better said opinions, in Almeida-Sanchez v. United States, 413 U.S. 266, 93 S.Ct. 2535, 37 L.Ed.2d 596 (1973). A careful…
• United States v. Cimino, 321 F.2d 509 (2d Cir. 1963)
  …United States, 9 Cir., 262 F. 2d 421, 422. There was no error in proceeding to trial without the missing witness. The granting of a continuance is a matter of discretion, see, e. g., Smith v. United States, 10 Cir., 273 F. 2d 462, 466, cert. denied 363 U.S. 846, 80 S.Ct. 1619, 4 L.Ed.2d 1729. We see no abuse of discretion in denial of the continuance. Appellant Cimino contends that the indictment should have been dismissed for vagueness. The point is utterly without merit. See Brown v. United States, 9 Ci…
• Leino v. United States, 338 F.2d 154 (10th Cir. 1964)
  …cess. A review of the evidence discloses ample justification for the verdict of the jury. Affirmed. . 18 U.S.C. § 2312. . Brooks v. United States, 10 Cir., 330 F. 2d 757, 758; Smith v. United States, 10 Cir., 273 F. 2d 462, 466, certiorari denied 363 U.S. 846, 80 S.Ct. 1619, 4 L.Ed.2d 1729; Spevak v. United States, 4 Cir., 158 F. 2d 594, 597, certiorari denied 330 U.S. 821, 67 S.Ct. 771, 91 L.Ed. 1272. . Neufield v. United States, 73 App.D.C. 174, 118 F. 2d 375, 380, certiorari denied Ruben v. United St…