LARSON
v.
UNITED STATES
LARSON
UNITED STATES
363 U.S. 849
Supreme Court of the United States (1960)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 21 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (21 total)
-
FAY v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391 (U.S. 1963)…equires only that he have an opportunity to correct errors that may have led to an unfair trial. The orderly administration of justice requires that even a criminal case some day come to an end.” 275 F. 2d, at 679-680. This Court denied certiorari. 363 U. S. 849. Decisions such as Sunal and Larson are reasoned expressions by the federal judiciary of its views on the fair and proper administration of federal criminal justice. We cannot turn around and tell the State of New York that it is constitutionally p…
-
Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. 171 (U.S. 1967)…ansport, Inc., 255 F. Supp. 596; Bieski v. Eastern Automobile Forwarding Co., 231 F. Supp. 710, aff’d, 354 F. 2d 414 (C. A. 3d Cir.); Ostrofsky v. United Steelworkers, 171 F. Supp. 782, aff’d per curiam, 273 F. 2d 614 (C. A. 4th Cir.), cert. denied, 363 U. S. 849; Jenkins v. Wm. Schluderberg-T. J. Kurdle Co., 217 Md. 556, 144 A. 2d 88. Assuming for the moment that Swift breached the collective bargaining agreement in discharging Owens and that the Union breached its duty in handling Owens’ grievance, this c…
-
Buckelew v. United States, 575 F.2d 515 (5th Cir. 1978)…cally involves a showing that the prisoner secured some tactical advantage by not pressing his claim earlier, see Morris v. United States, 503 F. 2d 457, 459 (5th Cir. 1974); Larson v. United States, 275 F. 2d 673, 674, 679 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 363 U.S. 849, 80 S.Ct. 1627, 4 L.Ed.2d 1732 (1960), explained in McKnight v. United States, 507 F. 2d at 1036 n.2. Moreover, in most cases a deliberate bypass must itself be proved at an evidentiary hearing, unless it is clearly shown on the record, as when the…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 21 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence