ADAMIETZ

v.

SMITH, POSTMASTER, PITTSBURGH

Citator

Cited By

• Minasian v. Capt. Paul R. Engle, 400 F.2d 137 (9th Cir. 1968)
  …y of the appropriate Military department, as an indispensable party? See Williams v. Fanning, 332 U.S. 490, 68 S.Ct. 188, 92 L.Ed. 95 (1947); Yates v. Manale, 341 F. 2d 294 (5 Cir. 1965); Adamietz v. Smith, 273 F. 2d 385 (3 Cir. 1960), cert, denied 363 U.S. 850, 80 S.Ct. 1628, 4 L.Ed.2d 1732; Bovard v. Young, 105 U.S.App.D.C. 241, 265 F. 2d 823 (D.C.Cir. 1959). 4. If a district court assumes jurisdiction of a habeas petition in the military service, is the scope of review to be applied the one of “basis i…
• Coughlin v. Ryder., 341 F.2d 291 (3d Cir. 1965)
  …relief sought by the appellant, Coughlin, cannot be granted by a decree directed against the appellee, [*292] Ryder, alone. Blackmar v. Guerre, 342 U.S. 512, 72 S.Ct. 410, 96 L.Ed. 534 (1952); Adamietz v. Smith, 273 F. 2d 385 (3 Cir.), cert. denied 363 U.S. 850, 80 S.Ct. 1628, 4 L.Ed.2d 1732 (1960). It follows that upon the present record the court below was without jurisdiction to entertain the action. Attention is directed, however, to Section 1391. Title 28 U.S.C., as amended by the Act of December 23…