MCGRATH ET AL.
v.
RHAY, SUPERINTENDENT, WASHINGTON STATE PENITENTIARY
MCGRATH ET AL.
RHAY, SUPERINTENDENT, WASHINGTON STATE PENITENTIARY
364 U.S. 279
Supreme Court of the United States (1960)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The respondent’s motion to dismiss the writ of certio-rari is denied. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Washington is vacated and the case is remanded for determination of the following questions of Washington law now involved in the case: (1) whether the case is moot as a habeas corpus proceeding; and (2) if it is, whether, to avoid mootness, it can properly be treated as an application for some other form of appropriate relief.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Local 174 v. Lucas Flour Co., 369 U.S. 95 (U.S. 1962)…24 U. S. 548, 551-552. In recent years we have, without challenge, reviewed on their merits several cases decided by a Department of the Washington Supreme Court in which no petition for rehearing en banc had been filed. See, e. g., McGrath v. Rhay, 364 U. S. 279; Ross v. Schneckloth, 357 U. S. 575; United States v. Carroll Construction Co., 346 U. S. 802. Since this was a suit for violation of a collective bargaining contract within the purview of § 301 (a) of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, th…