DEITLE
v.
UNITED STATES
DEITLE
UNITED STATES
364 U.S. 284
Supreme Court of the United States (1960)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for a hearing at which petitioner should be present.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Weldon Burris v. United States, 430 F.2d 399 (7th Cir. 1970)…trial and sentencing judge’s familiarity with the facts and circumstances surrounding the trial make it desirable for him to deal with such petitions. See Deitle v. United States, 302 F. 2d 116, 118 note 2 (7th Cir. 1962), vacated on other grounds, 364 U.S. 284, 80 S.Ct. 1622, 4 L.Ed.2d 1720; see also United States v. Smith, 337 F. 2d 49, 52-53 (4th Cir. 1964), certiorari denied, 381 U.S. 916, 85 S.Ct. 1542, 14 L.Ed.2d 436; Simmons v. United States, 302 F. 2d 71 (3d Cir. 1962). We need not decide whether…
-
Juelich v. United States, 316 F.2d 726 (5th Cir. 1963)…2 S.Ct. 510, 7 L.Ed.2d 473; United States v. Hayman, 1952, 342 U.S. 205, 72 S.Ct. 263, 96 L.Ed. 232; Porter v. United States, 5 Cir., 1962, 298 F. 2d 461; Nichols v. United States, 5 Cir., 1962, 310 F. 2d 374. See also Deitle v. United States, 1960, 364 U.S. 284, 80 S.Ct. 1622, 4 L.Ed.2d 1720. The case is remanded to the District Court with directions that a hearing be held in which the Petitioner is in attendance. This being a civil case with no requirement of confrontation of witnesses, the Court may, w…
-
Deitle v. United States, 302 F.2d 116 (7th Cir. 1962)…to proceed in forma pauperis and granted his petition for writ of certiorari. The Court ordered : “The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for a hearing at which petitioner should be present.” Deitle v. United States, 364 U.S. 284, 80 S.Ct. 1622, 4 L.Ed.2d 1720 (1960). A certified copy of the order of remandment by the Supreme Court was filed in the district court on July 27, 1960. On August 24, 1960, the district court entered a written order in this case setting defendant…