RUMMEL ET AL.

v.

MUSGRAVE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Hall v. State, 568 So. 2d 882 (Fla. 1990)
  …M’Naghten Rule.” Anderson v. State, 276 So. 2d 17 (Fla.1973); Campbell v. State, 227 So. 2d 873 (Fla.1969), cert. dismissed, 400 U.S. 801, 91 S.Ct. 7, 27 L.Ed.2d 33 (1970); Piccott v. State, 116 So. 2d 626 (Fla.1959), appeal dismissed, cert. denied, 364 U.S. 293, 81 S.Ct. 106, 5 L.Ed.2d 83 (1960); Davis v. State, 44 Fla. 32, 32 So. 822 (1902). Under the M’Naghten Rule an accused is not criminally responsible if, at the time of the alleged crime, the defendant was by reason of mental infirmity, disease, or d…
• Cary Michael Lambrix v. Dugger, 529 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. 1988)
  …to the two being excused. Go along with his wishes, if the court wishes to excuse them for cause.” A defendant has no right to any particular juror or jurors, only a fair and impartial jury. Piccott v. State, 116 So. 2d 626 (Fla.1959), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 293, 81 S.Ct. 106, 5 L.Ed. 2d 83 (1960). Petitioner struggles in vain to demonstrate how not having the Clem-onses on the jury was damaging to him. As for petitioner’s absence during the stipulations, there is no indication that he did not accede to th…
• Sims v. State, 184 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)
  …nary. Russom v. State, Fla.App. 1958, 105 So. 2d 380, 382; Adams v. Elliott, 1937, 128 Fla. 79, 174 So. 731. The Florida Supreme Court set out the general rule applicable here in Piccott v. State, 1959, 116 So. 2d 626, 627, appeal dism., cert. den., 364 U.S. 293, 81 S.Ct. 106, 5 L.Ed.2d 83: “As stated by this Court in Singer v. State, Fla.1958, 109 So. 2d 7, competency of a challenged juror is a question of mixed law and fact to be determined by the trial judge in his discretion and the decision of the tri…