COOPER ET AL.
v.
PITCHESS, SHERIFF, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, ET AL.

U.S. | 1960-10-17
No. 278
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Black are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
364 U.S. 294 Supreme Court of the United States (1960) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon, the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Black are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Soto, 423 So. 2d 362 (Fla. 1982)
    …on of the indictments in conjunction with the supporting requisition documents.” Greenbaum v. Harr, 220 Kan. 525, 528, 552 P. 2d 993, 996 (1976). Accord, In re Cooper, 53 Cal.2d 772, 349 P. 2d 956, 3 Cal.Rptr. 140, cert, denied and appeal dismissed, 364 U.S. 294, 81 S.Ct. 104, 5 L.Ed.2d 83 (1960); Papas v. Brown; Kansas v. Holeb, 188 Neb. 319, 196 N.W. 2d 387 (1972); In re Harris, 170 Ohio St. 151,163 N.E. 2d 762 (1959); Ex parte Harrison, 568 S.W. 2d 339 (Tex.Cr. App.1978). We agree. There is a practical…
  • Soto v. State, 409 So. 2d 1123 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
    …1, 43 Ill.Dec. 568, 410 N.E. 2d 568 (1980); Greenbaum v. Darr, 220 Kan. 525, 552 P. 2d 993 (1976); Kansas v. Holeb, 188 Neb. 319, 196 N.W. 2d 387 (1972); In Re Cooper, 53 Cal.2d 772, 3 Cal.Rptr. 140, 349 P. 2d 956, appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 364 U.S. 294, 81 S.Ct. 104, 5 L.Ed.2d 83 (1960); Ex Parte Arrington, 270 S.W. 2d 39 (Mo.1954). While we find this argument to be appealing, we are constrained by Ennist v. Baden, supra, to grant the writ of habeas corpus and discharge the petitioner from custod…
  • State v. Hunt, 584 So. 2d 228 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)
    …ion but of an asylum for those who commit crimes without being personally present at the place where their crimes are consummated. Soto, at 364, quoting In re Cooper, 53 Cal.2d 772, 349 P. 2d 956, 3 Cal.Rptr. 140, cert. denied and appeal dismissed, 364 U.S. 294, 81 S.Ct. 104, 5 L.Ed.2d 83 (1960). The Ohio indictment charged Hunt with violations of the Ohio Revised Code and alleged that Hunt’s acts intentionally resulted in violations of the Ohio code. Whether the State of Ohio has jurisdiction over Hunt a…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw