ALLRED ET AL.
v.
HEATON ET AL.

U.S. | 1960-12-19
No. 518
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits.
364 U.S. 517 Supreme Court of the United States (1960) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Schattman v. Tex. Emp. Comm'n, 459 F.2d 32 (5th Cir. 1972)
    …F.Supp. 117 (fixing wife’s residence by husband’s but not the reverse); Heaton v. Bristol (Tex.Civ.App.1958) 317 S.W. 2d 86, cert. denied 359 U.S. 230, 79 S.Ct. 802, 3 L.Ed.2d 765 and Allred v. Heaton (Tex.Civ.App.1960) 336 S.W. 2d 251, cert. denied 364 U.S. 517, 81 S.Ct. 293, 5 L.Ed.2d 265 (both involving denial of right of women to attend an all-male state-supported college). Conversely, sex-based classifications •have been nullified when no persuasive difference between women and men could be offered to…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw