WORTHINGTON CORP.
v.
MLODOZENIEC ET AL.
WORTHINGTON CORP.
MLODOZENIEC ET AL.
364 U.S. 628
Supreme Court of the United States (1961)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Georgia-Pacific Co., 421 F.2d 92 (9th Cir. 1970)…757 (9th Cir. 1946) ; Woodbury v. United States, 232 F.Supp. 49, 58 (D.Or.1964) aff’d and rev’d, 359 F. 2d 370 (9th Cir. 1966); United States v. County of Lawrence, 173 F.Supp. 307, 314 (W.D.Pa. 1959) rev’d o. g., 280 F. 2d 462 (3d Cir. 1960) aff’d, 364 U.S. 628, 81 S.Ct. 357, 5 L.Ed.2d 363 (1961); Davis, op. cit., supra, at 493 ; 28 Am.Jur.2d, § 132, at 801, 31 C.J.S. Estoppel § 140, at p. 691. The distinction between proprietary (private) and sovereign (governmental) functions is not often an easy or mea…