HOON

v.

HARMER STEEL PRODUCTS & SUPPLY CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc., 554 F.2d 790 (7th Cir. 1977)
  …n Hochfelder. We may not contravene a specific instruction or disregard the disposition of any question of law contained in the mandate. Nuveen relies on Hermann v. Brownell, 274 F. 2d 842 (9th Cir. 1960), cert. denied sub. nom., Herrmann v. Rogers, 364 U.S. 821, 81 S.Ct. 56, 5 L.Ed.2d 50, but that case stands only for the proposition that upon remand the juris [*794] diction of an appellate court is limited to those particularized points which were assigned for consideration, if the mandate was in that for…
• Frederick v. United States, 386 F.2d 481 (5th Cir. 1967)
  …the fact of and amount of the surety’s indebtedness. Lake County v. Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Co., 75 F. 2d 6 (5th Cir., 1935); 2d appeal, 84 F. 2d 115 (1936); Seaboard Surety v. Westwood Lake, Inc., 277 F. 2d 397 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 821, 81 S.Ct. 55, 5 L.Ed.2d 50 (1960); Hopkins v. National Surety Co., 154 La. 61, 97 So. 297 (1923). Cf., authority that a default judgment against the principal does not affect the surety in any respect. Fusz v. Trager, 39 La. Ann. 292, 1 So. 535 (188…
• Hattersley v. Bollt, 512 F.2d 209 (3d Cir. 1975)
  …of the premises. See III — A, supra, and N.T. 677. However, it is the right to either occupancy or control that determines Lazovitz’s status. See Hayes, supra, 312 F. 2d at 524; Girardi v. Lipsett, Inc., 275 F. 2d 492, 497 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 821, 81 S.Ct. 56, 5 L.Ed.2d 50 (1960); Davis v. City of Philadelphia, 153 Pa.Super. 645, 650, 35 A. 2d 77, 80 (1943). Bollt’s possession of the building is fully compatible with Lazovitz’s control of the portion of the premises under construction. Ind…