DIXIE, INC.,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Taglavore v. United States, 291 F.2d 262 (9th Cir. 1961)
  …police acted reasonably under the circumstances in the given case. Compare Rochin v. People of State of California, 1952, 342 U.S. 165, 72 S.Ct. 205, 96 L.Ed. 183, with Espinoza v. United States, 5 Cir., 1960, 278 F. 2d 802, certiorari denied 1961, 364 U.S. 827, 81 S.Ct. 625, 5 L.Ed.2d 55. See also Blackford v. United States, 9 Cir., 1957, 247 F. 2d 745, 751-752. We believe that officers Barkley and Borjesson acted unreasonably under the facts of the instant case. On the record before us these officers, wh…
• Watz v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 431 F.2d 100 (5th Cir. 1970)
  …has been withdrawn from navigation and while she is being reconditioned, she does not warrant her seaworthiness to those who work aboard her until she returns to active service. Latus v. United States, 2 Cir. 1960, 277 F. 2d 264, 266, cert. denied, 364 U.S. 827, 81 S.Ct. 65, 5 L.Ed.2d 55. The district court here, for example, found that at the time Watz was injured, he “was performing the duties of a seaman aboard the vessel, ÑOLA III, which was in navigable waters”. At one time, this determination would h…
• United States v. Lemuel Mont, 306 F.2d 412 (2d Cir. 1962)
  …ion from Mont’s person. The Government stresses that the envelopes were not withdrawn from Mont’s mouth by Bailey but were exploded by Carrozo’s blow to the solar plexus, and points to Espinoza v. United States, 278 F. 2d 802 (5 Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 827, 81 S.Ct. 65, 5 L.Ed.2d 55 (1960), as sanctioning even more vigorous methods of removal. The distinction between extraction and explosion seems dubious, even if we could believe that Mont possessed such singular oral retaining powers, and appellant…