LIPSCOMB

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Coleman v. United States, 295 F.2d 555 (D.C. Cir. 1961)
  …1946, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 376, 158 F. 2d 652, certiorari denied 1947, 331 U.S. 830, 67 S.Ct. 1347, 91 L.Ed. 1844. . See, e. g., Wheeler v. United States, supra note 3; Williams v. United States, 6 Cir., 1959, 272 F. 2d 822, 823, certiorari denied 1960, 364 U.S. 836, 81 S.Ct. 72, 5 L.Ed.2d 61. . The court is unanimous that Coleman was properly convicted of robbery. . Wheeler v. United States, supra note 3, 82 U.S.App.D.C. at page 368, 165 F. 2d at page 230. . Starr v. United States, 1958, 105 U.S. App.D.C. 9…
• Cassidy v. United States, 428 F.2d 585 (8th Cir. 1970)
  …sort to a pre-sentence report. As the District Court observed, the severity of the sentence, if within the maximum allowed, is a matter within the sound discretion of the judge. Lipscomb v. United States, 273 F. 2d 860 (8th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 836, 81 S.Ct. 72, 5 L.Ed.2d 61. Nor is the sentencing judge obliged to consider a pre-sentence report though it is within his discretion to do so. United States v. Williams, 254 F. 2d 253 (3d Cir. 1958); Rule 32(c), Fed.R.Crim.P. Judgment affirmed. . W…
• Azzone v. United States, 341 F.2d 417 (8th Cir. 1965)
  …tion No. 4- Coram no-bis may not be used as a substitute for an appeal. The questions whether the court’s instructions were prejudicial may not be reviewed in this proceeding. Lipscomb v. United States, 273 F. 2d 860, 865 (8 Cir. 1960), cert. denied 364 U.S. 836, 81 S.Ct. 72, 5 L.Ed.2d 61 (1960). [*420] Contention No. 5. We held in our opinion on the appeal on the merits, that the statute was neither ambiguous nor unconstitutional. 268 F. 2d at page 802. The issue was again resolved against appellant in his…