ASTOR

v.

ASTOR

Citator

Cited By

• Janies C. Morgan and Mary Jane Morgan v. Canaveral Port Auth., 202 So. 2d 884 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967)
  …Collins, Fla.1957, 96 So. 2d 793; Conoley v. Naetzker, Fla.App.1962, 137 So. 2d 6. The appellants rely upon Romine v. Cramer, Cir.Ct.Monroe Co.1958, 15 Fla.Supp. 195 (aff’d Fla.App.1959, 114 So. 2d 629; cert. denied, Fla. 1960, 122 So. 2d 778, and 364 U.S. 862, 81 S.Ct. 102, 5 L.Ed.2d 85); however, it is easily distinguishable from the case sub judice. First, the Romine case involved the trustees of the internal improvement fund as party plaintiff seeking voidance of a deed based upon overt misrepresentat…
• Acme Process Equip. Co. v. The United States, 347 F.2d 509 (Ct. Cl. 1965)
  …es, all of which the Government will refuse to reimburse if and when it decides to cancel the contract on the ground of the violation. As this court said in Companhia Atlantica v. United States, 180 F.Supp. 342, 347, 148 Ct.Cl. 71, 78, cert. denied, 364 U.S. 862, 81 S.Ct. 103, 5 L.Ed.2d 85 (1960), “it would be a great wrong to permit the Government to awaken such a ‘sleeper’ to justify its cancellation * * In that case, the plaintiff had fully apprised the defendant of the contingent fee arrangement at the…
• Cities Serv. Helex, Inc. v. The United States, 543 F.2d 1306 (Ct. Cl. 1976)
  …ord, DeVito v. United States, 413 F. 2d 1147, 1153-54, 188 Ct.Cl. 979, 990-91 (1969); Airco, Inc. v. United States, supra at 1135, 205 Ct.Cl. at 497; cf. Companhia Atlantica v. United States, 180 F.Supp. 342, 346-47, 148 Ct.Cl. 71, 78, cert. denied, 364 U.S. 862, 81 S.Ct. 103, 5 L.Ed.2d 85 (1960) (Government could not awaken a “sleeper,” an old material breach on which it had not acted, to justify cancellation made on an improper ground). 2. Even under the modified views of the permissible methods of handl…