ANNA COHEN, APPELLANT,
v.
SPRINGER MOTOR CO., INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1966-05-03
No. 65-630
Before HENDRY, C. J., and CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.
185 So. 2d 748 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1966) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This action arose out of an automobile accident. Plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile struck from the rear by one owned by the defendant. The issue of liability was determined by the court, in favor of the plaintiff. A jury trial on damages resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff for "no” dollars. We have considered the several contentions advanced by the plaintiff-appellant, and find them to be without merit. The evidence was in conflict as to whether the plaintiff suffered compensable injuries. We affirm the judgment on authority of White v. Acker, Fla.App.1963, 155 So.2d 176; Shaw v. Puleo, Fla.1964, 159 So.2d 641; Raffel v. Magarian, Fla.App.1964, 165 So.2d 249.

Affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Anastasio v. Summersett, 217 So. 2d 854 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969)
    …1966, 182 So. 2d 401. . Shaw v. Puleo, Fla.1964, 159 So. 2d 641; Utley v. Southern Metal Products Co., Fla.App.1959, 116 So. 2d 28. . cf. Clark v. Yellow Cab Company of Miami, Fla.App.1967, 195 So. 2d 39; Cohen v. Springer Motor Co., Fla.App.1966, 185 So. 2d 748; White v. Acker, Fla.App.1963, 155 So. 2d 176. . cf. Goldstein v. Walters, Fla.App.1961, 126 So. 2d 759; Andrews v. Cardosa, Fla.App.1957, 97 So. 2d 43. . cf. Hayes v. Hatchell, Fla.1964, 166 So. 2d 146 (rev’g Fla.App.1963, 157 So. 2d 855); White…
  • Clark v. Yellow CAB Co. OF Miami, 195 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)
    …evidence was in conflict as to whether the minor suffered compensable injuries. Therefore, the minor’s “zero” verdict is not inconsistent with the father’s recovery for medical bills and automobile damage. Cohen v. Springer Motor Co., Fla.App.1966, 185 So. 2d 748; White v. Acker, Fla.App.1963, 155 So. 2d 176. Appellants’ second point alleges an improper remark of appellees’ counsel made in closing argument before the jury. At the end of the argument counsel said, “ * * * if you allow damages for that and ma…
  • Connell v. Fralix, 293 So. 2d 798 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
    …ed upon authority of the rule stated in Radiant Oil Co. v. Herring, 146 Fla. 154, 200 So. 376 (1941). See also White v. Bacon, Fla.App.1964, 166 So. 2d 678; Heymann v. Fusco, Fla.App. 1961, 132 So. 2d 216; Cohen v. Springer Motor Co., Fla.App. 1966, 185 So. 2d 748. We have also considered appellees’ cross-assignments of error and find them to be without merit. Affirmed.…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw