STRUNK ET AL.

v.

BOMAR, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Feguer v. United States, 302 F.2d 214 (8th Cir. 1962)
  …2; Lyles v. United States, 1957, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 22, 254 F. 2d 725, 729, cert. den. 356 U.S. 961, 78 S.Ct. 997, 2 L.Ed.2d 1067; Smith v. United States, 9 Cir., 1959, 267 F. 2d 210, 211. See Lee v. Wiman, 5 Cir., 1960, 280 F. 2d 257, 265, cert. den. 364 U.S. 886, 81 S.Ct. 176, 5 L.Ed.2d 106. And even expert opinion on competency rises no higher than the reasons on which it is based; it is not binding upon the trier of the facts. Dusky v. United States, supra, p. 397 of 271 F. 2d; Gunther v. United States, 1…
• Thomas v. Cunningham, 313 F.2d 934 (4th Cir. 1963)
  …, is nevertheless clearly distinguishable from the instant case. There the testimony of two defense witnesses as to present insanity was rebutted by that of a court-appointed psychiatrist. And, in Lee v. Wiman, 280 F. 2d 257 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 364 U.S. 886, 81 S.Ct. 176, 5 L.Ed.2d 106 (1960), a lunacy commission report that the accused was insane was introduced only on the question of his mental condition at the time of the offenses.…
• United States ex rel. Carl G. Gerchman v. Mahoney, 355 F.2d 302 (3d Cir. 1966)
  …e mutually exclusive with a conviction and sentence for assault with intent to ravish. The other charges here were merged with the charge of assault with intent to ravish. See Commonwealth v. Soudani, 398 Pa. 546, 159 A. 2d 687 (1960), cert, denied, 364 U.S. 886, 81 S. Ct. 177, 5 L.Ed.2d 107 (1960). . § 401(j). added in 1944, 58 Stat. 746, later § 349(a) (10) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, 66 Stat. 163, 267-268, 8 Ü.S.C. § 1481(a) (10). . “A sentencing judge is not confined to the narrow…