BORROW

v.

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

Citator

Cited By

• Ogden v. United States, 303 F.2d 724 (9th Cir. 1962)
  …is area to the various Military Departments. . Parker v. Lester, 227 F. 2d 708, 715 (9th Cir. 1955). Compare Homer v. Richmond, 292 F. 2d 719, 722-723 (D.C. Cir. 1961); Borrow v. F.C.C., 109 U.S.App.D.C. 224, 285 F. 2d 666, 668 (1960), cert. denied 364 U.S. 892, 81 S.Ct. 223, 5 L.Ed.2d 188; Graham v. Richmond, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 288, 272 F. 2d 517, 521 (D.C.Cir.1959). . Industrial Personnel Security Review Regulation, § 67.3-1, 20 Fed.Reg. 1553, 1555 (1955). . See Communist Party of United States v. Subver…

  ← 1 / 4 →
• Laurens L. DeLANO v. The United States, 393 F.2d 517 (Ct. Cl. 1968)
  …st that because their waiting period was confined to Montreal, away from their homes and headquarters at Rouses Point, they were necessarily on duty status. In a case very much in point on this issue, Baca v. United States, 150 Ct.Cl. 70, cert. den. 364 U.S. 892, 81 S.Ct. 224, 5 L.Ed.2d 188 (1960), this court held that civilian bus drivers, who were employed by the Army to transport personnel between the White Sands Missile Range and their homes in the surrounding area, were not entitled to overtime compens…