GROVES

v.

KETTMANN, CHIEF OF POLICE, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Yellin v. United States, 374 U.S. 109 (U.S. 1963)
  …s request for an executive session, it is highly improbable that petitioner could obtain an injunction against the Committee that would protect him from public exposure. See Pauling v. Eastland, 109 U. S. App. D. C. 342, 288 F. 2d 126, cert. denied, 364 U. S. 900. Nor is there an administrative remedy for petitioner to pursue, should [*122] the Committee fail to consider the risk of injury to his reputation. To answer the questions put to him publicly and then seek redress is'no answer. For one thing, his te…
• Linus Pauling v. Globe-Democrat Publ'g Co., 362 F.2d 188 (8th Cir. 1966)
  …st him; and that the relief sought would require an unauthorized interference with the legislative branch. Again the Court of Appeals affirmed, Pauling v. Eastland, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 342, 288 F. 2d 126 (1960), and the Supreme Court denied certiorari, 364 U.S. 900, 81 S.Ct. 233, 5 L.Ed.2d 194. While that appeal was pending Pauling advised the Court of Appeals by letter that he was ready to submit the original signatures to the subcommittee. During the pendency of the petition for certi-orari a request was ma…
• Linus Pauling v. News Syndicate Co., Inc., 335 F.2d 659 (2d Cir. 1964)
  …the plaintiff and was examined only by him. . The Subcommittee Report recited Dr. Pauling’s unsuccessful efforts, between his two appearances, to have the subpoena quashed, see Pauling v. Eastland, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 342, 288 F. 2d 126, cert. denied, 364 U.S. 900, 81 S.Ct 233, 5 L. Ed.2d 194 (1960). It challenged Dr. Pauling’s assertions that the Subcommittee was investigating his views on nuclear testing, asserted the investigation was needed to determine whether the right of petition was in fact being util…